Police, Prosecutors Use Asset Forfeitures to Lease SUVs, Customize Motorcycles, Install WiFi at Home, and More
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, District Attorney Craig Stedman spent more than $21,000 of drug forfeiture money to lease a 2016 Toyota Highlander. After Stedman was ordered to release records of hundreds of thousands of dollars in additional expenditures from “drug-related” forfeitures, he appealed to the Court of Common Pleas, arguing those records were shielded from public disclosure.
In Illinois, former LaSalle County prosecutor Brian Towne is charged with criminal activity for misconduct and misappropriating public funds because he spent asset forfeiture funds on an SUV, WiFi for his home, and local sports programs.
Local prosecutors, drug task forces, and other law enforcement agencies use asset forfeiture funds as their own personal slush funds. In many jurisdictions, there is little to no oversight of how the money is spent. And often no records are kept. Civil forfeiture laws are liberally construed, enabling police to seize cash and property merely suspected of being connected to criminal activity even if the owner is never charged with a crime. This makes a perverse incentive for cops to abuse the practice and reap huge profits.
For example, in Macomb County, Michigan, an audit of local prosecutor Eric Smith was approved after a lawsuit revealed more than $100,000 in questionable expenditures. The money was taken from the asset forfeiture fund and allegedly spent on furniture, birthdays, and retirement parties. On April 17, 2019, Michigan State Police removed records from Smith’s offices.
Back in Illinois, a Department of Justice Inspector General audit discovered that a police department spent $20,000 in equitable sharing funds to customize two lightly used motorcycles with decorative chrome and heated handgrips. And the Philadelphia District Attorney’s office has spent $7 million in asset forfeiture funds in the last five years, including money spent on one construction contract awarded to a company with ties to the D.A.’s staff.
Source: reason.com
You might be interested in:
This Week’s Civil Forfeiture Outrage (Tenth in a Series: Baltimore Edition) | Stopping the abuse of civil forfeiture | Countering Civil Forfeiture Myths with Facts | Understanding Proceeds of Crime Laws: A Guide for Defendants | How Property Owners Can Prove Innocence in Court | Distracted media missed the asset forfeiture issue | Government self-interest corrupted a crime-fighting tool into an evil | Senators urge Biden to enable agency to seize tankers of Iran oil | Texas Nurse Sues Feds Over Abusive Civil Forfeiture Practices | Did You Know That Sheriffs Use Civil Asset Forfeiture To Steal Your Money? | John Oliver Cannot Believe Cops Use Civil Forfeiture Laws To Rob American Citizens of Thousands of $ | How Law Enforcement Uses Civil Forfeiture to Fund Operations | My Voice: Private property at risk in South Dakota | 18 U.S.C. § 981. CIVIL FORFEITURE | Vehicle Forfeiture: Legal Defense for Car & Truck Seizures | AOC Discovers the Horrors of Civil Asset Forfeiture, Rails Against the Practice in Congressional Hearing | Attorney Fees under CAFRA | Asset Recovery in Divorce – Protecting Your Assets | FBI Seizures and Forfeitures | FBI gives up attempt to confiscate more than $1 million in California pot-store cash | Seizure of Bitcoin for Civil Asset Forfeiture | Third-Party Claims in Forfeiture: Protecting Innocent Interests | Stealing Is Wrong, Even When It’s The Government Doing It | Comedy: Law & Order Civil Asset Forfeiture Unit
