Real Estate Forfeiture Defense – Rucci Law
Real Estate Forfeiture Defense: Protecting Your Property Rights
Understanding Real Estate Forfeiture
At Rucci Law, we understand the immense stress and fear associated with facing government allegations of property forfeiture. Real estate forfeiture – the seizure of your property by the government – often stems from allegations of involvement in criminal activity, even if you haven’t been formally charged with a crime. The government’s power to seize assets is a serious matter, and it’s crucial to understand your rights and the legal process.
Often, forfeiture proceedings are initiated under laws like 18 U.S. Code § 981 (civil forfeiture) or state asset forfeiture statutes. These laws permit the government to take property believed to be connected to criminal activity, regardless of your own criminal involvement.
Your Constitutional Rights in Forfeiture Cases
The government’s ability to seize property is not unlimited. Your rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments – due process and equal protection – are heavily implicated in forfeiture cases. Specifically, the government must demonstrate a strong connection between your property and the criminal activity they allege. This requires:
- Probable Cause: The government must present sufficient evidence to establish probable cause that your property is linked to a crime.
- Adverse Presumption: The government bears the burden of proving that your property is connected to illegal activity, rather than you proving it isn’t.
- Fair Hearing: You are entitled to a full and fair hearing, including the right to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses.
Common Grounds for Forfeiture Defense – A Rucci Law Approach
At Rucci Law, we aggressively challenge forfeiture claims by focusing on several key areas:
- Lack of Connection: We scrutinize the government’s evidence, seeking to demonstrate a lack of a direct or substantial connection between your property and the alleged crime.
- Unlawful Seizure: We investigate potential procedural errors in the forfeiture process, arguing that the government acted illegally.
- Exclusion of Evidence: We challenge the admissibility of illegally obtained evidence.
Don’t wait until the government moves to seize your property. Contact Rucci Law today for a confidential consultation. We’re dedicated to protecting your property rights and fighting for your future.
Rucci Law – Experienced Asset Forfeiture Defense Attorneys in California. (Contact Information Here)
Related:
How to Protect Your Business From Asset Forfeiture | Texas Nurse Sues Feds Over Abusive Civil Forfeiture Practices | A new twist on asset forfeiture | Indiana Supreme Court Finally Puts an End to the Timbs Asset Forfeiture Case— “Reminiscent of Captain Ahab’s Chase of the White Whale Moby Dick” | Excessive Fines Clause Defense – Protecting Your Rights | Forfeiture Cases Can Take Years, Even for the Innocent; Supreme Court May Help | Supreme Court Limits Police Powers to Seize Private Property | Clark Neily Discusses Civil Asset Forfeiture Policy | Executive Branch Overreach — Civil Forfeiture Abuse | Walberg, Paul Introduce Civil Asset Forfeiture Legislation | Understanding Civil Asset Forfeiture in California | Probable Cause in Seizure of Assets – A Legal Overview | Civil Asset Forfeiture with AGLA | Civil Forfeiture | Police Can Seize Property Even If the Owner Isn’t Charged | Six Craziest Things Cops Spent Forfeiture Money On | Justice Thomas Defends Victims of Policing for Profit | Policing for Profit: Justice Reformers Chip Away at Civil Asset Forfeiture | How and When Will I Get Back Property Seized by Police? | Five Myths of Civil Forfeiture | Legal Loopholes in California Forfeiture Law Explained | Asset Forfeiture: A Double Whammy of Bad Policy | Civil Asset Forfeiture: Unfair, Unjust, Un-American | Motion to Suppress in CAFRA Forfeiture Cases | Federal Asset Forfeiture: Navigating Complex Legal Procedures











