Sanctioned oligarch accuses U.S. of stealing his assets, vows to fight in Russian court

By Alexander Marrow
February 9, 202311:51 AM ESTUpdated a year ago

Summary
This content was produced in Russia where the law restricts coverage of Russian military operations in Ukraine
MOSCOW, Feb 9 (Reuters) – Konstantin Malofeyev, a Russian businessman who is under U.S. sanctions, on Thursday accused the United States of trying to steal $5.4 million of his assets, saying he would file a lawsuit in Russia, where his rights are protected.

U.S. prosecutors may confiscate $5.4 million belonging to Malofeyev, a judge in New York ruled last week, paving the way for the funds to potentially be used to help rebuild Ukraine.

00:01

02:10
The ruling marked the first forfeiture order for a Russian oligarch’s assets since the Department of Justice launched a task force in March last year aimed at squeezing the finances of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s allies after Moscow sent troops into Ukraine.

Malofeyev said his lawsuit in a U.S. court should be called “Malofeyev v The United States”.

“But such a lawsuit is impossible there: there is no justice in the U.S.,” he wrote on Telegram. “None of the robbed investors can defend their rights there.”

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Report this ad
Since Malofeyev did not contest the forfeiture request, prosecutors last week said the funds should be forfeited by default.

“I, as a citizen of Russia, a state with a thousand-year history of justice, will not file a lawsuit in an American court,” Malofeyev said. “Our laws are designed to protect our rights and I will apply to the competent authorities where I live.”

It was not clear whether a ruling in Malofeyev’s favour in a Russian court would have any impact on the U.S. case.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Report this ad
U.S. authorities have accused Malofeyev, the owner of Christian Orthodox television channel Tsargrad TV, of financing separatists in Crimea, which Russia annexed in 2014.

Malofeyev, who has denied financing separatists, was sanctioned by Washington in 2014 and charged with sanctions violations in 2022.

Reporting by Alexander Marrow Editing by Frances Kerry

You might also like:
The Heat: US Civil Asset Forfeiture Controversy | Civil Forfeiture: Legalized Theft by Police & Government | John Oliver Civil Asset Forfeiture Clip | Indiana Supreme Court Applies Eighth Amendment to Curb “Oppressive” Asset Forfeitures | We Need Transparency and Fairness in Civil Asset Forfeiture | Due Process in Forfeiture Defense | How Civil Forfeiture Helps Cops Steal from You (5-13-16) | Tennessee Corruption Case Raises Questions about Forfeiture and Police Office Culture | New Jersey Tightens Reins on Civil Asset Forfeiture | A Judge Tells the FBI It Can’t Keep Millions in Loot Seized from a Beverly Hills Vault | Two Minutes with Tim – Civil Asset Forfeiture (Ep13) | Texas Case May Spur Drug Money Rule Change | How police can take your stuff, sell it, and pay for armored cars with the money | Avoid seizures of cash by taking prudent measures | Forfeiture Defense & Civil Liberties Organizations | Institute for Justice’s Darpana Sheth Discusses Civil Asset Forfeiture | Top Legal Defenses Against Civil Forfeiture in California | Property Seized, Money Taken – But No Crime | Innocent Owner Defense | Timelines for Forfeiture Cases: A Comprehensive Guide | How to Safeguard Your Assets Legally | Massachusetts Worst in Nation for Civil Forfeiture Laws | The Role of Probable Cause in Forfeiture Cases | SB 98: Changes to Civil Asset Forfeiture