FBI Uses “Cute” Propaganda Campaign to Justify Civil Asset Forfeiture

You can’t make this up.

The FBI is normalizing the concept of civil asset forfeiture by using videos with cute puppies.

On June 25, 2019, the FBI tweeted a video of cute puppies to sell people on the idea of draconian civil asset forfeiture laws. In the tweet it stated, “civil forfeiture laws are helping the FBI and its partners get dogs rescued from dogfighting rings positioned to be treated, rehabilitated, and moved into better situations.”

CIVIL FORFEITURE LAWS ARE HELPING THE FBI AND ITS PARTNERS GET DOGS RESCUED FROM DOGFIGHTING RINGS POSITIONED TO BE TREATED, REHABILITATED, AND MOVED INTO BETTER SITUATIONS.

— FBI (@FBI) JUNE 25, 2019

Such cute imagery may make people have second thoughts about civil asset forfeiture, but when we dig deep into this practice, we realize that it’s legalized theft by another name.

Missouri
It’s no secret that civil asset forfeiture is one of the most polemical issues in America. In sum, it’s “a process by which the government can take and sell your property without ever convicting, or even charging, you with a crime.”

Because civil asset forfeiture is a strictly civil matter, defendants do not have the same protections as criminal defendants. Even if an individual is not found guilty of a crime, this does not guarantee that the government will return their property. Indeed, no one likes high taxes, so municipal governments and their law enforcement counterparts will get crafty in finding ways to raise revenue for the government.

Civil asset forfeiture is the go-to strategy for cash-strapped municipalities to collective revenue when conventional tax-raising methods may not be politically convenient. This has been a lucrative endeavor for law enforcement agencies, who’ve pocketed a cool $4.5 billion from this practice in 2014.

Under civil asset forfeiture, the state can seize items such as cars, cash, and real estate are all fair game. These items can be confiscated merely on the suspicion that an individual used them while committing a criminal act. Due process is not respected because of the fact that criminal convictions are not necessary for property to not be seized.

The FBI’s publication of this video may appear cute, but it’s nothing but propaganda. It ultimately gives a blatantly unconstitutional practice a rosy image. We must see through this ruse and understand that civil asset forfeiture must be put to an end if we want to live in a truly free society.

Related:
Feds seize millions in PPP funds from international ministry | Asset Forfeiture Defense Strategies – Mortgage Foreclosures | Dept of Justice Hoarding 28 Billion in Civil Asset Forfeiture Funds | Seizures of Currency from FedEx or UPS Packages | The World of Civil Asset Forfeitures | Stealing Is Wrong, Even When It’s The Government Doing It | When Government Can Seize Your Property | What Is Civil Forfeiture? | Federal vs California Forfeiture Laws Compared | Indiana Supreme Court Finally Puts an End to the Timbs Asset Forfeiture Case— “Reminiscent of Captain Ahab’s Chase of the White Whale Moby Dick” | Attorney Fees under CAFRA | Indiana Man Fights Police Use of Civil Forfeiture to Take His Land Rover | Ducey signs bill requiring conviction before assets are seized | This Week’s Civil Forfeiture Outrage (Eleventh in a Series: Highway Robbery in California) | For Phelps County: Seizing Suspects’ Assets Is Like ‘Pennies From Heaven’ | Feds Expand Forfeiture of Cryptocurrency | Forfeiture Reporting Requirements: A Comprehensive Guide | Property Seized, Money Taken – But No Crime | SPP S4E44: Civil Asset Forfeiture | Can the Government Seize Property Without Charges in California? | Civil Asset Forfeiture Part 1 | Boston Cops Fleece Citizens to Secretly Buy Controversial Spy Tech | What Assets Can Be Seized in California? | Civil Forfeiture | Police Can Seize Property Even If the Owner Isn’t Charged | Civil Forfeiture Now Requires A Criminal Conviction In Montana And New Mexico