Asset Forfeiture Trial – Rucci Law
Asset Forfeiture Defense: Protecting Your Property and Rights
Understanding Asset Forfeiture in California
At Rucci Law, we understand that facing an asset forfeiture case can be a terrifying experience. You’ve been accused of criminal activity, and now the government is seeking to seize your property – your home, your car, your savings – often without a criminal conviction. This is a dramatically different process than a typical criminal case, and it’s crucial to understand your rights.
Asset forfeiture is a civil legal action initiated by the government. Unlike a criminal trial where the prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, in an asset forfeiture case, the government needs to establish a nexus – a link between the property and the alleged criminal activity. This lower standard of proof can make these cases incredibly challenging.
The Process & Your Rights
The forfeiture process typically involves several stages:
- Administrative Warrant: The government files an administrative warrant with a U.S. District Court, requesting the seizure of the property.
- Notice of Hearing: You will receive notice of a hearing where you can challenge the warrant.
- Hearing: This is where you present your defense. Common arguments include challenging the government’s evidence, arguing insufficient nexus, or raising due process concerns.
- Administrative Order: If the court finds a sufficient nexus, it issues an administrative order authorizing the seizure.
- Judicial Review: You can then appeal the administrative order to a U.S. District Court for a full judicial review.
Crucially, the government’s burden of proof is significantly lower than in a criminal case. We at Rucci Law are committed to aggressively challenging every aspect of the government’s case, focusing on demonstrating a lack of evidence, procedural errors, and constitutional violations.
Common Grounds for Challenge – Protecting Your Assets
We frequently address these key issues in asset forfeiture cases:
- Lack of Evidence: Demonstrating the government lacks sufficient evidence linking you to the crime.
- Insufficient Nexus: Challenging the connection between the property and the alleged criminal activity.
- Due Process Violations: Arguing the government failed to follow proper procedures, potentially leading to evidence suppression.
- Property Seizure Errors: Identifying inaccuracies in the seizure process itself.
Don’t face this process alone. Rucci Law has a dedicated team of experienced criminal defense attorneys specializing in asset forfeiture cases in California. We’re committed to protecting your property rights and navigating the complexities of the legal system on your behalf. Contact us today for a confidential consultation.
© 2023 Rucci Law. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
You might be interested in:
How Police use Civil Asset Forfeiture to Legally Steal | John Stossel – Civil Asset Forfeiture | Highway Robbery: Philly Cops Abuse Civil Forfeiture. Seize $50M, 1,240 Properties & 3,530 Vehicles. | Joe Biden Praising War on Drug’s Civil Asset Forfeiture: “We Can Take Everything!” (1991 Senate) | Mutual Legal Assistance in Forfeiture Defense | Policing for Profit: Law Enforcement Agencies Abuse Civil Asset Forfeiture | Asset Forfeiture Vehicle Defense | Criminal vs Civil Forfeiture: Key Differences Explained | Civil Forfeiture – Don’t Feel Bad | Texas Case May Spur Drug Money Rule Change | Joe Biden Praising War on Drug’s Civil Asset Forfeiture: “We Can Take Everything!” (1991 Senate) | JUSTICE MANUAL 9-115.000 – Use And Disposition Of Seized And Forfeited Property | Derek Cohen on Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform | Innocent Owner Defense in Asset Forfeiture: Protecting Your Property Rights | Ducey signs bill requiring conviction before assets are seized | Asset Forfeiture; a Commentary on the Legal Marijuana Industry’s Achilles Heel | FBI and California sheriff illegally seized marijuana cash belonging to licensed dispensaries, lawsuit claims | Government self-interest corrupted a crime-fighting tool into an evil | What the President Should Do: Civil Asset Forfeiture (CATO Institute) | These states let police take and keep your stuff even if you haven’t committed a crime | Police cash confiscations still on the rise | Sanctions threaten to cripple Russia’s multibillion-dollar crypto industry | $3 Million Federal Court Settlement: Philadelphia Agrees to End Civil Forfeiture | Clarence Thomas vs. Jeff Sessions on Civil Asset Forfeiture











